Recently, on social networking sites, there have been a number of misleading articles about land management in our country, specifically on the site Bueau - Europe, Thai Hao, with a passage that reads: "From the place of private ownership reform. Land has been converted into public ownership. All of them lost their land, became hired laborers on their own land… Up to now, the land is still “owned by the whole people. That is, people do not have the right to own."
The above views and opinions are completely wrong and need to be rejected because:
Firstly, according to the 2013 Land Law, land users: “The State protects property rights to land use rights in the form of certificates of land use rights and ownership of houses and properties. other attached to the land; enjoy the results of labor and investment on land; have the right to convert, transfer, lease, sublease, inherit, donate, mortgage or contribute land use rights as capital; be compensated when the State recovers. In the end, these rights can only be exercised within the following limits: To use land in accordance with the land use purposes prescribed by the State when allocating or leasing land and according to the State's land use master plans and plans. Land users are not allowed to change the land use purpose voluntarily; land allocation and lease with term, excluding residential land; The State has the right to recover the allocated land use rights with compensation to the person whose land use right is revoked;
Second, Vietnam's current selection of the entire people's ownership regime is completely appropriate. Vietnam's all-people ownership of land is in line with the socialist-socialist goal that the Party, Uncle Ho and our people have chosen. In addition to the common interests that must be respected, such as the right to effectively organize land use (by the State's land use master plans and plans), the right to collect absolute rents and differential rents not imposed by the user. use of created land, the right to recover land for the benefit of society, all related rights are completely appropriate. The market for land use rights is limited only by the non-change of land use purpose and the duration of land allocation. However, the land allocation term may be changed in a longer direction to ensure that the investor recovers the investment value, but not for the benefit of the individual, but to reduce the general benefit of the society. comply with the land use planning and the added value from the land not created by the investor must be returned to the common society. Ownership of the whole people creates conditions for the State to be proactive in controlling land resources as well as regulating land-interest relations in accordance with national interests and direct land users. The State can both allocate and recover land in accordance with the interests of land users, support the poor, and create a land fund for the general development of the country without having to make too complicated agreements with the land users. private entities. Ownership of the whole people also facilitates State management by planning and planning on land use and improving the overall efficiency of the use of the national and local land funds. Ownership of the whole people creates conditions for the State to be proactive in controlling land resources as well as regulating land-interest relations in accordance with national interests and direct land users. The State can both allocate and recover land in accordance with the interests of land users, support the poor, and create a land fund for the general development of the country without having to make too complicated agreements with the land users. private entities. Ownership of the whole people also facilitates State management by planning and planning on land use and improving the overall efficiency of the use of the national and local land funds. Ownership of the whole people creates conditions for the State to be proactive in controlling land resources as well as regulating land-interest relations in accordance with national interests and direct land users. The State can both allocate and recover land in accordance with the interests of land users, support the poor, and create a land fund for the general development of the country without having to make too complicated agreements with the land users. private entities. Ownership of the whole people also facilitates State management by planning and planning on land use and improving the overall efficiency of the use of the national and local land funds. land acquisition… suitable for the interests of land users, supporting the poor, and creating land fund for the general development of the country without having to negotiate too complicatedly with private entities. Ownership of the whole people also facilitates State management by planning and planning on land use and improving the overall efficiency of the use of the national and local land funds. land acquisition… suitable for the interests of land users, supporting the poor, and creating land fund for the general development of the country without having to negotiate too complicatedly with private entities. Ownership of the whole people also facilitates State management by planning and planning on land use and improving the overall efficiency of the use of the national and local land funds.
The all-people ownership of land is consistent with the socialist orientation of the market economy in Vietnam. The goal of the socialist orientation is to build a society in which people are not only free and equal in political terms, but also free, economically equal, and equal in terms of their rights and interests. The country's most important means of production is land. This is the ownership regime of the whole society for the benefit of the entire Vietnamese nation. In the regime of all-people ownership, a number of rights are assigned to state agencies, some rights are assigned to the people in order to harmonize the relationship between public and private interests, and create conditions for land users promote land resources for socio-economic development.
At this point, it can be affirmed that the views, guidelines, policies and laws on land of our Party and State are completely correct and suitable for the interests of the entire people. We must fight and criticize the wrong views and perceptions about the land ownership regime in Vietnam./.
Vietnamese Humanities
Comments